Видео

I hate your voice……it is an order of magnitude worse than finger nails across a chalkboard.

That md80 landed almost 6000 feet down the runway. Ridiculous.

Wow the DC9 landing is so amazing

DC-9 pilot probably just reliving his Navy days flying into GTMO. You have to basically do a stop, drop and roll on approach to avoid Cuban airspace. Pucker factor of 10.

Clickbait. Just a blown tire! Takeoff went just fine. How about 767 blows tire on takeoff roll. 🙄

"Under Pressure" David Bowie..

Very skilled pilot on that DC-9 approach. A350 is such a good looking aircraft

That A350 must have been an empty repositioning flight

The 767 takeoff goes wrong at 2:00 is Flight Simulator, you dingus. You can tell by how the framerate stutters at precise intervals, to say nothing of the anti-aliasing falling short on the edges of the scenery objects, and the visibility falling off like CGI rather than how it does in IRL. I called it within the first 2 seconds. If you would be original and not try to copy the original guy who does these videos, maybe you would be a bit more observant.

Air France proving you really can always go around, if it don't look right coming down. :-)

Airbus for da wiiiin

Jesus, quit with the clickbait titles!

DC-9 approach feels like the pilots passed out and the only knowledgable passenger is a guy very proficient in having fun in X-Plane

boeing is going to go out of buisness

What a goofy ass video.

The take-off did not go wrong. It was successful.

It was everything good until you become to promote games I am do understand that its your upload vids but publicity its not a choice on goods videos I am about to unsubscribe your channel its was a pleasure to join you channel until the publicity point. Good luck fella!!!

Need a refresher in the definition of "gone wrong"

What is up with the 767-300's? They always are having issues. And that Anchorage plane isn't a DC-9 It's a MD-80. Though technically you can call it a DC-9 Super 80. (DC-9-80) MD-80's have bigger engines than the DC-9's had. DC-9's had the JT8D-17 family of engines. This plane at 1:15 had the JT8D-200 family of engines (bigger than the 17's)

0:43 This is a MD83 - not a DC 9

BOING (FORMERLY KNOWN AS BOEING)

I remember that day. I’d just did a line before trying to get on the ground.

Dc9 pilot ex navy lol

There is no 767

That DC-9 approach is animation.

Love the way DC9 landed 🤗

My friends that DC-9 pilot has been flying in ALaska his or her entire life I think?? That was greasy as hell!! You see the timing on the reverse thrust too? haha....he was feeling it that day. The old line between good and cocky sure means a lot in flying. Confidence kills just as easy as it is required too.

The DL 763 tire blowing happened several years ago at DTW.

the DC-9 was a runway change

Aerosecure has perfected the art of flying overweight.

AirFrance pilot should seek out the MD-80 driver in Anchorage for some help with approach and landing technique.

*************NOBODY WANTS TO HEAR YOUR VOICEOVER************

How do I upload videos to this guy that posts these videos I have several take offs and landings

Good videos 📷👍

2:11 looks like Gran Canaria? Don’t remember them having that kind of weather in winter…

clearly the blown tire is Boeing's fault

the slo-mo ruined this......just show it as normal and avoid the silly gimmicks......

Sorry mate, you can’t park there!

I don't think pulling landing gear up was good decision. Tire or brakes could be on fire.

The 767's take-off wasn't "wrong." A tire blew almost at the time that the plane reached take-off speed. At that point, pilots are trained to quickly assess the situation and decide to either abort the take-off or continue it. The pilots did what they were trained to do and chose to continue the take-off. If the pilots had made a different choice, the 767 could have come to a stop before the end of the runway, as 767s are designed and built to do. If the problem had been different and an engine had blown instead of a tire, the pilots could have continued the take-off and climbed out on one engine because twin-engine airliners are designed and built to do that, too. This time, the pilots continued the take-off, burned off a lot of fuel, and safely delivered their passengers to the destination on their tickets.

Imagine being so lucky to experience 2 go arounds - my dream 😅

A321 aborted take-off looks like LPA (Las Palmas, Gran Canaria)?

I heard that guy just didn't want to land cuz he was watching the in flight movie and hadn't finished his complimentary bag of honey roasted peanuts.

That last clip::: Couldn't understand the last clip location, and closed caption couldn't either. Going by a sign in one of the buildings, stating 934th Airlift Wing, places it in Minneapolis Minnesota.

The falloff is insane

🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀

Air France seems to struggle a lot lately. Anyway, third attempt was a great one.

"Aye-r-buss"?

Where was that 321 taking off from? Tatooine?

The DC9 landing was unreal, got to love those old time full mechanical blockage T/R's!